NBA Lockout: Bryant Gumbel is wrong about David Stern being a racist
TUESDAY, 25 OCTOBER 2011 12:12
http://www.newjerseynewsroom.com/professional/nba-lockout-bryant-gumbel-is-wrong-about-david-stern-being-a-racist
BY EVAN WEINER
NEWJERSEYNEWSROOM.COM
THE BUSINESS AND POLITICS OF SPORTS
There is an old television industry joke whenever the name Gumbel is bandied about. It goes something like this. "Which Gumbel, the good Gumbel Greg? Or is it the bad Gumbel Bryant?" The "bad" Gumbel, Bryant, let loose with yet another opinion last week on his thoughts about the National Basketball Association Commissioner David Stern and the NBA’s owners induced work stoppage.
The NBA owners have locked out a certain segment of the employees — the players.
Gumbel's "editorial" on his HBO “Real Sports” show is rather pointed and is a personal attack on Stern and his role in the negotiations between the owners and players.
What Gumbel didn't point out is that David Stern works for 29 owners and they apparently are supporting him in his role as NBA owners’ negotiator.
If the 29 NBA owners were upset with Stern, he would have been replaced at the bargaining table with someone else. In the 1994 Major League Baseball strike, the owners dumped Richard Ravitch as the chief bargainer and replaced him with Randy Levine.
What is troubling about Gumbel's characterization of Stern (Note, I do not get along with Stern who can be bullying and sarcastic and condescending although he is the commissioner who has raised the bar and has forced other sports owners, leagues and entities to ramp up in their pursuit of modern technology. Stern also took a page out of the old Ed Sullivan show by making a NBA game an event rather than a mere athletic competition by pointing out what celebrities were at games and having celebrities promote the game as in the NBA is Fan-tastic. Stern has pushed his product globally although he has gotten lucky during his career with favorable United States federal legislation such as the 1984 Cable TV Act and the 1986 reform of the tax codes which enabled owners to increase revenues from cable TV and municipal officials desire to become "major league cities" and build publicly owned arenas and giving owners sweetheart leases.)
Gumble likened Stern to a southern plantation owner prior to the Civil War.
“If the NBA lockout is going to be resolved any time soon, it seems likely to be done in spite of David Stern, not because of him,” Gumbel said. “I say that because the NBA's infamously egocentric commissioner seems more hell bent lately on demeaning the players than resolving his game’s labor impasse.
“How else to explain Stern’s rants in recent days?" said Gumbel in his opinion piece. "To any and everyone who’d listen, he has alternatively knocked union leader Billy Hunter, said the players were getting inaccurate information and started sounding Chicken Little claims about what games might be lost if players didn't soon see things his way.
“Stern’s version of what’s been going on behind closed doors has, of course, been disputed. But his efforts were typical of a commissioner who has always seemed eager to be viewed as some kind of modern plantation overseer, treating NBA men as if they were his boys.
“It’s part of Stern’s M.O., like his past self-serving edicts on dress code or the questioning of officials, his moves are intended to do little more than show how he's the one keeping the hired hands in their place.
“Some will, of course, cringe at that characterization, but Stern’s disdain for the players is as palpable and pathetic as his motives are transparent. Yes, the NBA's business model is broken, but to fix it maybe the league’s commissioner should concern himself most with the solution and stop being part of the problem.”
Stern, who used to stop by the Westchester Democrats functions, is no racist nor does he have a "modern plantation overseer" mentality. The NBA is Stern's life and he wants to sell a presentable product to consumers and he zealously guards over the league. Back in 1983-84 Stern was part of an owners/players group, which faced numerous problems. The league was too black, too many drug addicts were on rosters, the owners were losing money and there was a possibility of contracting seven teams.
The NBA of David Stern's days as a counsel in the late 1970s included the use of a telethon to save a franchise — Indiana — and tape delayed games on CBS in the finals.
The 1983 collective bargaining agreement which was authored by Stern, Russell Granik, Gary Bettman (who invented the salary cap) from the owners side and National Basketball Players Association Executive Director Lawrence Fleisher and his players is credited with saving the NBA and allowed the new Commissioner Stern (he got the job in 1984) to sell the game globally.
Stern got help from Phil Knight and NIKE and other advertisers in promoting Michael Jordan globally. Stern and the NBA marketers were able to turn a conception — the 1983 NBA is too black — into a global behemoth.
If Gumbel wants to use the plantation mentality mantra let him also discuss this nugget from 1964. It seems Los Angeles Lakers owner Bob Short was ready to evict his resident superstar Elgin Baylor from the NBA in a labor dispute as Tommy Heinsohn recalled.
The National Basketball Players Association came into existence in 1956, but it would not be until 1964 that the players would relax their collective muscle and threaten the owners with a work stoppage in demands were not met. The nationally televised NBA All-Star Game in Boston almost did not come off for two reasons. There was a blizzard and there was an All-Star vote to boycott the game without a new collective bargaining agreement.
The owners never took the players association or player demands seriously and beginning in the fall of 1963, the players became more assertive.
"That was the All-Star Game in which the association was finally recognized as a bargaining unit," said Heinsohn, who was the head of the group and a Boston Celtics player at the time. "There was a new Commissioner, Walter Kennedy. Maurice Podoloff, who had been the Commissioner, refused to meet with us. Gave us lip service at times and just infuriated the players.
"It all came to a head at this All-Star Game because Walter Kennedy, even when Larry Fleisher who was the Director of the Players Association. We met with Kennedy in Stamford, Connecticut and he promised to give us a hearing in front of all the Governors and we brought in all the officers in October, 1963 and they had all of us cool our heels in the hotel lobby and never did see us.
"We all went back to our various teams and this was what the setting was for the 1964 All-Star Game."
Money was an issue and so was a pension plan. But there were more than just money issues on the table. Playing conditions were a key element of the players’ complaints.
"It had to do with playing conditions," said Heinsohn. "We didn't have trainers, every team did not have a trainer. Playing on a Saturday night and be expected to take an all night train and play an afternoon game on Sunday on national television.
"All things regarding the game, not just money issues. The key
issue was the pension plan. At that 64 All-Star, there was a blizzard and players were straggling in and we didn't know exactly what was going to happen. But all the All-Star players finally agreed when they arrived that they weren't going to play unless they (the owners) agreed to give us a pension plan and meet all the other demands."
There was tension underneath the Boston Garden stands and in the teams locker rooms as the players decided to strike the NBA's midseason showcase. The players and the NBA association reps were going to take a stand and meant business. Kennedy was furious but met with the players anyway.
"Walt Kennedy came into the locker room after the last player came into the locker room at 5 PM. We had a meeting and the players signed onto the procedure we recommended. We told Walter Kennedy what was going to happen and he went berserk because all the owners had gone out to dinner in the blizzard and he could not round them all up. He was put under the gun to get the ownership to meet. We went into the locker room, each team had its own locker room, but we assembled in one locker room, all the All-Star players.
"At that point, some of the owners tried to get in but we gave instructions to the police not to let anybody in. We sent word in to some owners, to (Lakers owner) Bob Short who sent word into Elgin Baylor that if Baylor didn't get his ass out of there that he would be done in the game.
"Elgin Baylor told him to go f*** himself. Finally, Walter
Kennedy came in and said, guys I can't reached all of these people. They are all over the place. But I will give you my word that you will have what you want. And he lived up to his word."
Collective Bargaining negotiations are contentious and arduous. Gumbel was right when he criticized Gene Upshaw for giving NFL owners a salary cap and other goodies in the NFL owners/NFL players collective bargaining negotiations. Upshaw also went after money and never looked down the road to get his players retirement benefits including a better pension and most importantly lifelong health insurance. He was right about Katie Couric and Elizabeth Taylor.
Gumbel is wrong about David Stern. All Stern is doing is acting on behalf of the owners. He doesn't work for the players nor does he act as an advocate for fans and/or consumers.
Evan Weiner, the winner of the United States Sports Academy's 2010 Ronald Reagan Media Award, is an author, radio-TV commentator and speaker on "The Politics of Sports Business." His book, "The Business and Politics of Sports, Second Edition" is available at bickley.com, Barnes and Noble or Amazon Kindle.
Showing posts with label David Stern. Show all posts
Showing posts with label David Stern. Show all posts
Tuesday, October 25, 2011
Thursday, October 13, 2011
NBA lockout and the blame game
THURSDAY, 13 OCTOBER 2011 13:41
http://www.newjerseynewsroom.com/professional/nba-lockout-and-the-blame-game
BY EVAN WEINER
NEWJERSEYNEWSROOM.COM
THE BUSINESS AND POLITICS OF SPORTS
Sportswriters and sports pundits have reduced the cause of the National Basketball Association lockout to simple bumper sticker fitting terms such as the billionaires versus millionaires spat or greed or in one case on ESPN.com, "Idiots" but that's too much of a sophomoric view of the labor dispute.
There is far more to the lockout that meets the eye.
It is actually galling to read the sportswriters version of the NBA lockout and that David Stern is the dictator behind the labor action and caused the lockout. It is an owners lockout of employees and Stern is the negotiator on behalf of the owners.
If Stern was not pleasing the owners he would have been phased out of the bargaining. In 1994, Major League Baseball marginalized Richard Ravitch and replaced him with Randy Levine in the collective bargaining sessions.
Even more galling is to see a column about Stern lasting too long as a commissioner and that the lockout tarnishes his legacy. ESPN writer Ian O'Connor apparently failed to realize or didn't do the research that Stern is employed by NBA owners and if those 29 owners were really upset with Stern, he would have been replaced. Major League Baseball fired Fay Vincent when they voted 18-9 in favor of no confidence in his leadership. Vincent resigned after the vote in 1992 and was replaced by an owner, Milwaukee's Bud Selig.
Pete Rozelle, who in the 1960s helped enrich National Football League owners as Commissioner was really fired by the owners in 1989 although he submitted his resignation, because of flat television revenues and a series of lawsuits (Al Davis v NFL when the league refused to allow Davis to move his Raiders to Los Angeles and the USNFL-NFL antitrust case) and two players strikes.
The commissioner serves the owners, not the fans or players and his (or hers) main job is to maximize owners revenue streams. Stern has done just that and has enough league owners watching his back that he remains on the job.
The National Basketball Association lockout has roots in politics and bad decisions by politicians to become partners with the league by building arenas and stadiums for sports owners and endowing them with sweetheart leases in which the public picks up much of the costs in sports facility construction with little to show except some intrinsic pride in having a team or being part of the big leagues.
Sports leagues also got richer thanks to the 1984 cable TV legislation which created a basic expanded tier and allowed multiple system operators to bundle cable TV networks like ESPN, CNN and The Weather Channel onto that tier and sell it as one package to consumers which skirted antitrust laws.
The legislation saved ESPN from oblivion and allowed cable operators and sports owners to build networks and collect subscriber money from 100 percent of the basic expanded tier universe instead of the few who might want to purchase a channel (the legislation has allowed news channels with scant audiences along with sports programming to prosper as there is a cable TV socialism where everybody pays for what a small percentage of the subscribers actually watch).
Because of population, New York, Los Angeles and Chicago get more cable TV money from local markets than Memphis, New Orleans and other small cities which creates an inequity in finances and while teams are committed to paying a set amount for salaries for players, other areas such as coaching, scouting and marketing vary between the franchises.
But there is some sort of pride in having a big league team in an area, at least that is what elected officials think as they spend taxpayers dollars.
Charlotte Mayor Pat McCrory offered one of the most inane statements ever uttered by an elected official as to why his city in 2003 needed to build an arena to get a replacement franchise after George Shinn took his NBA Hornets to New Orleans when the city would not replace the then 15-year old Charlotte Coliseum.
McCrory said the reason that city needed an arena and an NBA team for exposure and mentions on ESPN SportsCenter and you could not buy that type of publicity. Charlotte built a new arena after voters by about a two to one majority said no in an arena referendum. The NBA returned to Charlotte awarding an expansion team to one of the founder of Black Entertainment Television Robert Johnson for the 2004-05 season.
Financially despite a new municipally-build arena with all the bells and whistles of luxury boxes, club seats and other potential revenue sources, the Charlotte Bobcats franchise is a financial disaster. The Bobcats franchise has limited corporate support and a small TV market.
One of the Bobcats owners Michael Jordan (the game's biggest drawing card and individual player revenue producer in the 1980s and 1990s) was fined by NBA Commissioner David Stern for giving an interview to an Australian newspaper and pointing out the league needs a revenue sharing plan and a new owners-players agreement that insures cost certainty.
"We need a lot of financial support throughout the league as well as revenue sharing to keep this business afloat,” he explained.
"We have stars like (Milwaukee Bucks Andrew) Bogut who are entitled to certain type of demands. But for us to be profitable in small markets, we have to be able to win ballgames and build a better basketball team."
Jordan spoke the truth but was under a gag order not to talk about the lockout and was fined by Stern.
Jordan owns a team in a market which cannot compete with franchises that print money like the New York Knicks and the soon-to-be printing even more money Los Angeles Lakers because of numerous reasons. Charlotte doesn't have the wherewithal to support his team like James Dolan's Knicks because you cannot compare the two city's corporate support or like Jerry Buss will have in Los Angeles next year when two Los Angeles Lakers TV networks will materialize, one in English and one in Spanish.
Buss is partnering with Time Warner Cable and will establish the two networks which is like owning the keys to the Denver mint. Charlotte doesn't have a chance to get equal TV money nor does Memphis nor does Orlando.
Miami, a midsized market with a limited television market and a poor corporate base in a very crowded sports city seems to be an outlier as is San Antonio. Miami gets support when there is a championship contending team in place as Heat games become the thing to do.
In 1986, President Ronald Reagan signed tax code reforms legislation which was crafted by the House of Representatives and the Senate. One of the provisions in the law dealt with stadium and arena funding. A local government entity could put up money for the construction of a sports facility and could offer a sports owner a lease that guaranteed the owner as much as 92 percent of the revenues generated in the facility. The federal government's new law stated that just eight cents on every dollar made in a facility had to go to paying down the debt in the building which meant taxpayers not the team owner would be responsible for paying the bills.
It didn't take long for sports owners to pounce on the new law. Cities which had no business being in the "big leagues" got franchises. The NBA added Orlando, Minneapolis-St. Paul, Miami and Charlotte in 1987 although that expansion was planned prior to Reagan's signature. The NBA wanted to add only two teams. In retrospect the four team expansion was a poor decision although it netted the then 23 NBA owners $130 million to split equally.
Cash on the barrelhead is what sports is all about.
Almost from the get go, the Orlando Arena was too small and lacked owners' toys like luxury boxes and club seats. The same held true in Charlotte and Miami. In Minneapolis-St. Paul Timberwolves ownership could not afford the team and building an arena on their own dime. By 1994 they worked out a deal to sell the franchise to boxing promoter Bob Arum who wanted to move the franchise to New Orleans. The league blocked the move and found a local buyer while the city of Minneapolis took over the building. Charlotte moved, Miami got a new building just 11 years after the Miami Arena opened up.
The league put two teams in Canada, Toronto and Vancouver for $100 million each. The $200 booty was gobbled up by the 27 NBA owners and split equally with each owner getting a bit less than $8 million. Vancouver was a financial pit for Arthur Griffiths who could not afford paying the NBA debt while owning the National Hockey League's Vancouver Canucks and building an arena on his own loony. Griffiths sold the team to an American investor John McCaw in 1996. McCaw tried to get rid of the money losing team in 1999 and sell it to Bill Laurie who intended on bringing the franchise to St. Louis. The NBA didn't approve the team. McCaw sold the franchise in 2000 to Heisey. A year later the franchise was relocated to another city that didn't have the wherewithal to compete with the big boys on the block: Memphis.
Ironically the NBA lockout of 1998-99 probably finished off corporate interest in the Grizzlies in Vancouver. Attendance fell and McCaw was hindered by working in Canadian dollars. The loony was worth about 62 American cents at that time.
In the 1990s cities built new arenas and stadium because the threat an owner would take his business elsewhere was real. The NBA didn't move any franchises in the 1990s but a good number of new arenas popped up with virtually every franchise with the exception of the Knicks and New Jersey Nets getting either a new arena or a renovated structure. The cities that didn't the new buildings saw the local owner find that the grass was greener elsewhere or so they thought.
George Shinn left Charlotte for New Orleans and found out that New Orleans is another really cannot compete with the big boys city pre-Katrina and post-Katrina and gave up his ownership of the team. The NBA now has the deed to the franchise and is beating the bushes to see if anyone wants the team and keep it in New Orleans.
The Seattle SuperSonics franchise ownership got a renovation at the city owned arena in 1995 but that wasn't good enough. Two ownerships later, after failing to get a new Seattle arena, the team moved to Oklahoma City where local politicians gave away everything not nailed to the floor to make sure Oklahoma City Thunder ownership could stand a chance of being in the same financial ballpark as the Knicks and Lakers.
The NBA needs an agreement with the league's business partners----the players---and on the owners terms because the league is in so many cities that really cannot compete with the Knicks template (arena ownership, franchise ownership and cable TV ownership) or the Lakers template (television network) that comes with massive corporate support. The rust belt cities like Cleveland, Detroit and Milwaukee have something in common with Sunbelt cities like Charlotte, Memphis, New Orleans and Orlando. Portland, Sacramento and Salt Lake City are in that group too. The owners need revenue sharing aid from not only the players but from James Dolan and Jerry Buss.
NBA ownership gladly sold franchises to owners in cities that had no business being in the league without solid revenue sharing between the owners. Before the explosion of local TV monies through cable revenues in 1984, the NBA had financial health issues. The 1983 collective bargaining agreement with the players probably saved seven franchises that could have been contract including Indianapolis, Salt Lake City, Kansas City, San Diego and Cleveland.
San Diego Clippers owner Donald Sterling took his team to Los Angeles without league approval. Kansas City ownership sold the team to Sacramento interests. The franchise has skated on thin financial ice for more than 15 years and again the league is wrestling with the franchise's future home. The Maloof brothers have been unable to secure financing for a new building in the California state capital and have threatened to move the team to Anaheim if they don't get a new arena in Sacramento.
It is the second time in 15 years that Kings ownership has flirted with Anaheim. The TV money is much greater in Anaheim as part of the Los Angeles DMA or designated market area than Sacramento.
Getting a financial structure that works for the owners seems to be the owners goal. The players don't want to have to protect the owners from making bad decisions on spending money on talent. But to just reduce the dispute to a bumper sticker slogan is a rather lazy approach to see the multitude of problems that were caused by cable TV legislation and tax code revisions.
The owners could share money but there is the Caveat Emptor principle also.
Owners like Heisey wanted a team and took whatever was available. Heisey left Vancouver for what he thought was paradise in Memphis. It didn't work out financially. In Indianapolis the Simon family got a new arena at the turn of the century but even with getting every conceivable revenue break from the city and the Capital Improvement Board, the franchise cannot charge New York prices in Indiana and doesn't have the Knicks TV deal.
The small market owners asked for increases in revenue sharing in 2007 and that didn't happen.
Oddly enough, all the politicians who have skin inthe game, because games are economic generators for a city if you believe them, are strangely quiet about the lockout. You would think with cities having problems with finances and threatening to lay off workers and cut services that they would be pressuring the owners and players to get a deal done. New York, Philadelphia, Los Angeles and other cities are losing per day tax dollars from the visiting team players who perform in those cities. Restaurants and hotels are losing business but the sound you hear from politicians is that of silence. They created the modern NBA and sports but politicians are quiet and so are the corporations who buy the luxury boxes and club seats.
Nothing from them either.
It seems the only people who care about the lockout are sportswriters, sports radio talk show hosts and the participants in the NBA.
Evan Weiner, the winner of the United States Sports Academy's 2010 Ronald Reagan Media Award, is an author, radio-TV commentator and speaker on "The Politics of Sports Business." His book, "The Business and Politics of Sports, Second Edition" is available at bickley.com, Barnes and Noble or Amazon Kindle.
THURSDAY, 13 OCTOBER 2011 13:41
http://www.newjerseynewsroom.com/professional/nba-lockout-and-the-blame-game
BY EVAN WEINER
NEWJERSEYNEWSROOM.COM
THE BUSINESS AND POLITICS OF SPORTS
Sportswriters and sports pundits have reduced the cause of the National Basketball Association lockout to simple bumper sticker fitting terms such as the billionaires versus millionaires spat or greed or in one case on ESPN.com, "Idiots" but that's too much of a sophomoric view of the labor dispute.
There is far more to the lockout that meets the eye.
It is actually galling to read the sportswriters version of the NBA lockout and that David Stern is the dictator behind the labor action and caused the lockout. It is an owners lockout of employees and Stern is the negotiator on behalf of the owners.
If Stern was not pleasing the owners he would have been phased out of the bargaining. In 1994, Major League Baseball marginalized Richard Ravitch and replaced him with Randy Levine in the collective bargaining sessions.
Even more galling is to see a column about Stern lasting too long as a commissioner and that the lockout tarnishes his legacy. ESPN writer Ian O'Connor apparently failed to realize or didn't do the research that Stern is employed by NBA owners and if those 29 owners were really upset with Stern, he would have been replaced. Major League Baseball fired Fay Vincent when they voted 18-9 in favor of no confidence in his leadership. Vincent resigned after the vote in 1992 and was replaced by an owner, Milwaukee's Bud Selig.
Pete Rozelle, who in the 1960s helped enrich National Football League owners as Commissioner was really fired by the owners in 1989 although he submitted his resignation, because of flat television revenues and a series of lawsuits (Al Davis v NFL when the league refused to allow Davis to move his Raiders to Los Angeles and the USNFL-NFL antitrust case) and two players strikes.
The commissioner serves the owners, not the fans or players and his (or hers) main job is to maximize owners revenue streams. Stern has done just that and has enough league owners watching his back that he remains on the job.
The National Basketball Association lockout has roots in politics and bad decisions by politicians to become partners with the league by building arenas and stadiums for sports owners and endowing them with sweetheart leases in which the public picks up much of the costs in sports facility construction with little to show except some intrinsic pride in having a team or being part of the big leagues.
Sports leagues also got richer thanks to the 1984 cable TV legislation which created a basic expanded tier and allowed multiple system operators to bundle cable TV networks like ESPN, CNN and The Weather Channel onto that tier and sell it as one package to consumers which skirted antitrust laws.
The legislation saved ESPN from oblivion and allowed cable operators and sports owners to build networks and collect subscriber money from 100 percent of the basic expanded tier universe instead of the few who might want to purchase a channel (the legislation has allowed news channels with scant audiences along with sports programming to prosper as there is a cable TV socialism where everybody pays for what a small percentage of the subscribers actually watch).
Because of population, New York, Los Angeles and Chicago get more cable TV money from local markets than Memphis, New Orleans and other small cities which creates an inequity in finances and while teams are committed to paying a set amount for salaries for players, other areas such as coaching, scouting and marketing vary between the franchises.
But there is some sort of pride in having a big league team in an area, at least that is what elected officials think as they spend taxpayers dollars.
Charlotte Mayor Pat McCrory offered one of the most inane statements ever uttered by an elected official as to why his city in 2003 needed to build an arena to get a replacement franchise after George Shinn took his NBA Hornets to New Orleans when the city would not replace the then 15-year old Charlotte Coliseum.
McCrory said the reason that city needed an arena and an NBA team for exposure and mentions on ESPN SportsCenter and you could not buy that type of publicity. Charlotte built a new arena after voters by about a two to one majority said no in an arena referendum. The NBA returned to Charlotte awarding an expansion team to one of the founder of Black Entertainment Television Robert Johnson for the 2004-05 season.
Financially despite a new municipally-build arena with all the bells and whistles of luxury boxes, club seats and other potential revenue sources, the Charlotte Bobcats franchise is a financial disaster. The Bobcats franchise has limited corporate support and a small TV market.
One of the Bobcats owners Michael Jordan (the game's biggest drawing card and individual player revenue producer in the 1980s and 1990s) was fined by NBA Commissioner David Stern for giving an interview to an Australian newspaper and pointing out the league needs a revenue sharing plan and a new owners-players agreement that insures cost certainty.
"We need a lot of financial support throughout the league as well as revenue sharing to keep this business afloat,” he explained.
"We have stars like (Milwaukee Bucks Andrew) Bogut who are entitled to certain type of demands. But for us to be profitable in small markets, we have to be able to win ballgames and build a better basketball team."
Jordan spoke the truth but was under a gag order not to talk about the lockout and was fined by Stern.
Jordan owns a team in a market which cannot compete with franchises that print money like the New York Knicks and the soon-to-be printing even more money Los Angeles Lakers because of numerous reasons. Charlotte doesn't have the wherewithal to support his team like James Dolan's Knicks because you cannot compare the two city's corporate support or like Jerry Buss will have in Los Angeles next year when two Los Angeles Lakers TV networks will materialize, one in English and one in Spanish.
Buss is partnering with Time Warner Cable and will establish the two networks which is like owning the keys to the Denver mint. Charlotte doesn't have a chance to get equal TV money nor does Memphis nor does Orlando.
Miami, a midsized market with a limited television market and a poor corporate base in a very crowded sports city seems to be an outlier as is San Antonio. Miami gets support when there is a championship contending team in place as Heat games become the thing to do.
In 1986, President Ronald Reagan signed tax code reforms legislation which was crafted by the House of Representatives and the Senate. One of the provisions in the law dealt with stadium and arena funding. A local government entity could put up money for the construction of a sports facility and could offer a sports owner a lease that guaranteed the owner as much as 92 percent of the revenues generated in the facility. The federal government's new law stated that just eight cents on every dollar made in a facility had to go to paying down the debt in the building which meant taxpayers not the team owner would be responsible for paying the bills.
It didn't take long for sports owners to pounce on the new law. Cities which had no business being in the "big leagues" got franchises. The NBA added Orlando, Minneapolis-St. Paul, Miami and Charlotte in 1987 although that expansion was planned prior to Reagan's signature. The NBA wanted to add only two teams. In retrospect the four team expansion was a poor decision although it netted the then 23 NBA owners $130 million to split equally.
Cash on the barrelhead is what sports is all about.
Almost from the get go, the Orlando Arena was too small and lacked owners' toys like luxury boxes and club seats. The same held true in Charlotte and Miami. In Minneapolis-St. Paul Timberwolves ownership could not afford the team and building an arena on their own dime. By 1994 they worked out a deal to sell the franchise to boxing promoter Bob Arum who wanted to move the franchise to New Orleans. The league blocked the move and found a local buyer while the city of Minneapolis took over the building. Charlotte moved, Miami got a new building just 11 years after the Miami Arena opened up.
The league put two teams in Canada, Toronto and Vancouver for $100 million each. The $200 booty was gobbled up by the 27 NBA owners and split equally with each owner getting a bit less than $8 million. Vancouver was a financial pit for Arthur Griffiths who could not afford paying the NBA debt while owning the National Hockey League's Vancouver Canucks and building an arena on his own loony. Griffiths sold the team to an American investor John McCaw in 1996. McCaw tried to get rid of the money losing team in 1999 and sell it to Bill Laurie who intended on bringing the franchise to St. Louis. The NBA didn't approve the team. McCaw sold the franchise in 2000 to Heisey. A year later the franchise was relocated to another city that didn't have the wherewithal to compete with the big boys on the block: Memphis.
Ironically the NBA lockout of 1998-99 probably finished off corporate interest in the Grizzlies in Vancouver. Attendance fell and McCaw was hindered by working in Canadian dollars. The loony was worth about 62 American cents at that time.
In the 1990s cities built new arenas and stadium because the threat an owner would take his business elsewhere was real. The NBA didn't move any franchises in the 1990s but a good number of new arenas popped up with virtually every franchise with the exception of the Knicks and New Jersey Nets getting either a new arena or a renovated structure. The cities that didn't the new buildings saw the local owner find that the grass was greener elsewhere or so they thought.
George Shinn left Charlotte for New Orleans and found out that New Orleans is another really cannot compete with the big boys city pre-Katrina and post-Katrina and gave up his ownership of the team. The NBA now has the deed to the franchise and is beating the bushes to see if anyone wants the team and keep it in New Orleans.
The Seattle SuperSonics franchise ownership got a renovation at the city owned arena in 1995 but that wasn't good enough. Two ownerships later, after failing to get a new Seattle arena, the team moved to Oklahoma City where local politicians gave away everything not nailed to the floor to make sure Oklahoma City Thunder ownership could stand a chance of being in the same financial ballpark as the Knicks and Lakers.
The NBA needs an agreement with the league's business partners----the players---and on the owners terms because the league is in so many cities that really cannot compete with the Knicks template (arena ownership, franchise ownership and cable TV ownership) or the Lakers template (television network) that comes with massive corporate support. The rust belt cities like Cleveland, Detroit and Milwaukee have something in common with Sunbelt cities like Charlotte, Memphis, New Orleans and Orlando. Portland, Sacramento and Salt Lake City are in that group too. The owners need revenue sharing aid from not only the players but from James Dolan and Jerry Buss.
NBA ownership gladly sold franchises to owners in cities that had no business being in the league without solid revenue sharing between the owners. Before the explosion of local TV monies through cable revenues in 1984, the NBA had financial health issues. The 1983 collective bargaining agreement with the players probably saved seven franchises that could have been contract including Indianapolis, Salt Lake City, Kansas City, San Diego and Cleveland.
San Diego Clippers owner Donald Sterling took his team to Los Angeles without league approval. Kansas City ownership sold the team to Sacramento interests. The franchise has skated on thin financial ice for more than 15 years and again the league is wrestling with the franchise's future home. The Maloof brothers have been unable to secure financing for a new building in the California state capital and have threatened to move the team to Anaheim if they don't get a new arena in Sacramento.
It is the second time in 15 years that Kings ownership has flirted with Anaheim. The TV money is much greater in Anaheim as part of the Los Angeles DMA or designated market area than Sacramento.
Getting a financial structure that works for the owners seems to be the owners goal. The players don't want to have to protect the owners from making bad decisions on spending money on talent. But to just reduce the dispute to a bumper sticker slogan is a rather lazy approach to see the multitude of problems that were caused by cable TV legislation and tax code revisions.
The owners could share money but there is the Caveat Emptor principle also.
Owners like Heisey wanted a team and took whatever was available. Heisey left Vancouver for what he thought was paradise in Memphis. It didn't work out financially. In Indianapolis the Simon family got a new arena at the turn of the century but even with getting every conceivable revenue break from the city and the Capital Improvement Board, the franchise cannot charge New York prices in Indiana and doesn't have the Knicks TV deal.
The small market owners asked for increases in revenue sharing in 2007 and that didn't happen.
Oddly enough, all the politicians who have skin inthe game, because games are economic generators for a city if you believe them, are strangely quiet about the lockout. You would think with cities having problems with finances and threatening to lay off workers and cut services that they would be pressuring the owners and players to get a deal done. New York, Philadelphia, Los Angeles and other cities are losing per day tax dollars from the visiting team players who perform in those cities. Restaurants and hotels are losing business but the sound you hear from politicians is that of silence. They created the modern NBA and sports but politicians are quiet and so are the corporations who buy the luxury boxes and club seats.
Nothing from them either.
It seems the only people who care about the lockout are sportswriters, sports radio talk show hosts and the participants in the NBA.
Evan Weiner, the winner of the United States Sports Academy's 2010 Ronald Reagan Media Award, is an author, radio-TV commentator and speaker on "The Politics of Sports Business." His book, "The Business and Politics of Sports, Second Edition" is available at bickley.com, Barnes and Noble or Amazon Kindle.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)